• Home
  • About
  • Program
  • Logistics
  • Abstracts

Atmospheric Forcing of Hudson Bay Sea Ice in Spring

Atmospheric Forcing of Hudson Bay Sea Ice in Spring
Abstract Category: 
1.2. Understanding the Linkages and Feedbacks Between the Arctic System Components
Type: 
Parallel
Time: 
16 March 2010 - 1:30pm
Klaus P. Hochheim1, Jennifer V. Lukovich2, David G Barber3
1Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada, Phone 204 474-9980, hochheim [at] cc [dot] umanitoba [dot] ca
2Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada, lukovich [at] cc [dot] umanitoba [dot] ca
3Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada, dbarber [at] cc [dot] umanitoba [dot] ca

In this study we examine thermodynamic and dynamic forcing of sea ice during spring from 1980-2005. Thermodynamic contributions to seasonal ice loss in Hudson Bay are investigated using correlations between trends in sea ice extent and surface air temperatures (SATs), while dynamic contributions are investigated using correlations between SAT anomalies and climate indices. Correspondence between changes in ice and atmospheric circulation patterns in Hudson Bay is also examined in the context of relative vorticity to ascertain regional contributions to ice and atmospheric variability, and resulting feedback mechanisms.

Results of the study show that using both fall and spring SATs significantly improve the prediction interannual spring sea ice extents. Including the relative vorticity of ice with SATs, up to 80% of the variance in spring time SIEs can be explained. Teleconnection data is presented showing that interannual SATs are highly correlated to the East Pacific/North Pacific (EP/NP) index, this index together with the PDO are predictive of SATs during the break-up period (R=0.57, p=0.0017). Analysis shows that sea ice relative vorticity exhibits significant variability from 1980 to 2006, with an increase in frequency and duration of cyclonic activity during summer following 1998. In addition, statistically significant correlations between ice relative vorticity and SIC anomalies demonstrate connections between circulation and ice accumulation and/or depletion during spring.

Presentation PDF

application/pdf iconDownload PDF (3.33 MB)
  • ‹ previous
  • 16 of 160
  • next ›

Browse Session Abstracts

  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the plenary session
  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the parallel session
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • Products
  • Attendees
  • Sponsors
  • Side Meetings
  • Video Archive
  • Press
  • ARCUS Logo
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • News
  • Organizing Committee
  • Search
  • Log In
National Science Foundation | Division of Arctic Sciences
National Science Foundation
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Arctic System Science Program
Arctic System Science Program
US Arctic Research Commission
US Arctic Research Commission
North Slope Science Initiative
North Slope Science Initiative
International Arctic Science Committee
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Department of Energy
Department of Energy
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
World Wildlife Fund
WWF
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Land Management
International Study of Arctic Change
International Study of Arctic Change
ArcticNet
ArcticNet
DAMOCLES
Developing Arctic Modeling and Observing Capabilities for Long-term Environmental Studies

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the ARCUS Cooperative Agreement ARC-0618885. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.