• Home
  • About
  • Program
  • Logistics
  • Abstracts

A Comprehensive Analysis of Ship-mediated Invasion Risk in the Canadian Arctic

A Comprehensive Analysis of Ship-mediated Invasion Risk in the Canadian Arctic
Abstract Category: 
2.5. Responses to Arctic Change
Type: 
Parallel
Time: 
17 March 2010 - 11:35am - 11:50am
Farrah T. Chan1, Sarah A. Bailey2, Hugh J. MacIsaac3, Reuben Keller4
1Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research (GLIER), University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada, Phone 519-253-3000, Fax 519-971-3616, chan11c [at] uwindsor [dot] ca
2Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Box 5050, Burlington, ON, L7R 4A6, Canada, Phone 519-253-3000, Fax 519-971-3616, sarah [dot] bailey [at] dfo-mpo [dot] gc [dot] ca
3Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research (GLIER), University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, N9B 3P4, Canada, Phone 519-253-3000 , Fax 519-971-3616, hughm [at] uwindsor [dot] ca
4Program on the Global Environment, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA

Ballast water discharge and hull fouling are significant transport vectors of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) globally. The introduction of ANS by ship vectors has been identified as an activity that may negatively impact the Canadian Arctic ecosystem, but there has been no scientific evaluation of the current level of risk. In addition, climate change may increase the risk of ANS introductions to the arctic region because melting of the polar ice cap will allow increased vessel access to arctic waters. ANS also may experience increased natural dispersal. In addition to these changes in dispersal of ANS to the Arctic, climate change may also enhance the probability of establishment for some ANS.

We will present the first analysis of ship-mediated invasion risk in the Canadian Arctic based on ship traffic and environmental matching between donor and recipient ports. We summarized 2005–2008 shipping data from the Canadian Coast Guard's Information System on Marine Navigation and Transport Canada's Ballast Water Database, and use vessel arrivals and ballast water discharge volume as proxy measures for propagule pressure. Our results show that Iqaluit, Churchill and Deception Bay appear to be at highest risk because they receive a disproportionate number of vessel arrivals and/or ballast discharges originating from coastal and foreign ports. Iqaluit had the greatest number of annual vessel arrivals (44 ± 2 S.E.M) of all ports; Churchill received the greatest annual volume (142,322 m3 ± 17,296) of ballast water discharge and the second largest annual number of vessel arrivals (35 ± 4 S.E.M.); Deception Bay received 20 (± 5 S.E.M.) vessel arrivals and 15,984 m3 (± 12,382 S.E.M.) of ballast water discharge annually.

We refined risk by comparing temperature and salinity between potential source and recipient ports to determine the likelihood of ANS establishment post-introduction. For ANS introduction via ballast water discharge, Port Alfred appears to be a potential donor of ANS to Churchill because of high propagule pressure (i.e. ship traffic) and environmental similarity between the two ports. Similarly, Lower Cove is a potential source of ANS for Deception Bay. The results of this study will provide important baseline information about the relative level of invasion risk at arctic ports, and will be used to determine sampling sites for biological assessment of ballast water and hull fouling biota in subsequent studies.

Presentation PDF

application/pdf iconDownload PDF (1.17 MB)
  • ‹ previous
  • 87 of 160
  • next ›

Browse Session Abstracts

  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the plenary session
  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the parallel session
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • Products
  • Attendees
  • Sponsors
  • Side Meetings
  • Video Archive
  • Press
  • ARCUS Logo
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • News
  • Organizing Committee
  • Search
  • Log In
National Science Foundation | Division of Arctic Sciences
National Science Foundation
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Arctic System Science Program
Arctic System Science Program
US Arctic Research Commission
US Arctic Research Commission
North Slope Science Initiative
North Slope Science Initiative
International Arctic Science Committee
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Department of Energy
Department of Energy
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
World Wildlife Fund
WWF
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Land Management
International Study of Arctic Change
International Study of Arctic Change
ArcticNet
ArcticNet
DAMOCLES
Developing Arctic Modeling and Observing Capabilities for Long-term Environmental Studies

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the ARCUS Cooperative Agreement ARC-0618885. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.