• Home
  • About
  • Program
  • Logistics
  • Abstracts

On the Microphysical Representation of Observed Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds

On the Microphysical Representation of Observed Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds
Abstract Category: 
3.1. Interactions Between the Arctic and the Earth System
Type: 
Parallel
Time: 
17 March 2010 - 5:50pm - 6:05pm
Paquita Zuidema1, Paul Lawson2, Hugh Morrison3
1University of Miami, RSMAS/MPO 4600 Rickenbacker Cswy, Miami, FL, 33149, USA, Phone 305 421-4276, Fax 305-421-4696, pzuidema [at] rsmas [dot] miami [dot] edu
2SPEC, Inc., Boulder, CO, 80305, USA
3NCAR, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA

Articulating Arctic cloud microphysics is important towards modeling future radiative feedbacks upon Arctic climate. Updated analyses of in situ microphysical properties of three Arctic cloud systems sampled by aircraft in July 1998 during SHEBA/FIRE.ACE are examined in detail and compared with surface-based millimeter Doppler radar. The clouds were at °N over a melting ice surface, in distinctly different yet typical synoptic conditions. The cases comprise a mid-level all-ice cloud on 8 July, a deep, weakly forced, layered, mixed-phase stratus cloud system with pockets of drizzle, large dendrites, rimed ice and aggregates on 18 July, and a deep, mixed-phase cloud system with embedded convection on 28 July followed by an all-water boundary-layer cloud on 29 July. The new observations include measured ice water contents exceeding 2 g m-3 on 18 and 28 July, 3-cm snowflakes and 5-mm graupel particles on 28 July, unexpected in clouds close to the North Pole. The cloud cases help provide insight into the cloud changes that accompany recent changes in Arctic climate. The observed snow particle size distributions are then analyzed with the intent of developing exponential fits suitable for use in in one-moment microphysical schemes. Exponential fits for the deep mixed-phase clouds are generally in agreement with previous observations of mid-latitude frontal systems, but differ for shallow mixed-phase clouds. This suggests that cloud microphysical one-moment schemes applied to the Arctic climate need to find ways to take the observed variability into account.

Presentation PDF

application/pdf iconDownload PDF (929.53 KB)
  • ‹ previous
  • 97 of 160
  • next ›

Browse Session Abstracts

  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the plenary session
  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the parallel session
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • Products
  • Attendees
  • Sponsors
  • Side Meetings
  • Video Archive
  • Press
  • ARCUS Logo
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • News
  • Organizing Committee
  • Search
  • Log In
National Science Foundation | Division of Arctic Sciences
National Science Foundation
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Arctic System Science Program
Arctic System Science Program
US Arctic Research Commission
US Arctic Research Commission
North Slope Science Initiative
North Slope Science Initiative
International Arctic Science Committee
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Department of Energy
Department of Energy
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
World Wildlife Fund
WWF
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Land Management
International Study of Arctic Change
International Study of Arctic Change
ArcticNet
ArcticNet
DAMOCLES
Developing Arctic Modeling and Observing Capabilities for Long-term Environmental Studies

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the ARCUS Cooperative Agreement ARC-0618885. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.