• Home
  • About
  • Program
  • Logistics
  • Abstracts

State of Arctic Social and Economic Conditions: An Analysis of the Circumpolar Regions

State of Arctic Social and Economic Conditions: An Analysis of the Circumpolar Regions
Abstract Category: 
1.1. Advances in Understanding Arctic System Components
Type: 
Parallel
Time: 
16 March 2010 - 4:15pm
Gerard Duhaime1, Andrée Caron2
1Sociology Department, Université Laval, Pavillon Charles-de-Koninck, 1030, avenue des sciences humaines, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada, Phone 418-656-2131, Fax 418-656-3023, Gerard [dot] Duhaime [at] soc [dot] ulaval [dot] ca
2Chaire Condition Autochtone, Canada

Standard economic theory suggests that economic growth trickles down in society, increasing general well-being and living conditions. Amartya Sen argues that is not necessarily the case. He describes development as a process of expanding the real freedoms that people enjoy, and removing major sources of unfreedom such as the lack of access to health services and education, inadequate housing and economic poverty. Based on ArcticStat, it is now possible to perform simultaneous analysis of several indicators that have only been separately analyzed so far. This paper put together basic indicators measuring economic, demographic, health and education conditions for each arctic regions of the circumpolar world. Through graphic analysis, it concludes that three models best describe the development of arctic regions, the North-American, the Scandinavian and the Russian ones. However, each model shows important variations, all of them concerning regions where large cohorts of indigenous or ethnic minorities are represented. These results are explained mainly by the redistributive structure of each regional cluster, and by the status of indigenous or ethnic peoples. The method used set the table for time-series analysis, which will make it possible to shed light on the social construction process of the models; moreover it suggests a way for integrating social and environmental types of data.

Key words: human development, economic development, models, Arctic, circumpolar, regions, indigenous people, ethnic minorities, ArctiStat.

Presentation PDF

application/pdf iconDownload PDF (2.24 MB)
  • ‹ previous
  • 10 of 160
  • next ›

Browse Session Abstracts

  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the plenary session
  • View abstracts for the talks in each of the parallel session
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • View abstracts for the poster presentations
  • Products
  • Attendees
  • Sponsors
  • Side Meetings
  • Video Archive
  • Press
  • ARCUS Logo
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • News
  • Organizing Committee
  • Search
  • Log In
National Science Foundation | Division of Arctic Sciences
National Science Foundation
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
International Arctic Systems for Observing the Atmosphere
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Study of Environmental Arctic Change
Arctic System Science Program
Arctic System Science Program
US Arctic Research Commission
US Arctic Research Commission
North Slope Science Initiative
North Slope Science Initiative
International Arctic Science Committee
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Arctic Ocean Sciences Board
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Alaska Ocean Observing System
Department of Energy
Department of Energy
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
World Wildlife Fund
WWF
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Association of Polar Early Career Scientists
Bureau of Land Management
Bureau of Land Management
International Study of Arctic Change
International Study of Arctic Change
ArcticNet
ArcticNet
DAMOCLES
Developing Arctic Modeling and Observing Capabilities for Long-term Environmental Studies

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the ARCUS Cooperative Agreement ARC-0618885. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.